Jack Smith, the special counsel, argued that the bid of Donald Trump to subvert the election of 2020 was far from the constitutionally protected speech or the advocacy misplaced case. So he args the judges of the federal court to sweep aside Donald Trump’s case in the Trump’s Washington, D.C., trial.
The assistant of special counsel James Pearce said,
“The defendant attempts to rewrite the indictment, claiming that it charges him with wholly innocuous, perhaps even admirable conduct — sharing his opinions about election fraud and seeking election integrity,” when in fact it clearly describes the defendant’s fraudulent use of knowingly false statements as weapons in furtherance of his criminal plans.”
Smith’s team presented the strongest case yet for Trump’s prosecution in a 79-page document, repeatedly portraying Trump’s false allegations of election fraud as deliberate lies meant to deceive election officials, including governors, secretaries of state, and even his own vice president, Mike Pence.
In addition, Smith said he planned to provide evidence at Trump’s March trial proving the businessman incited the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, and then exploited it to promote his attempts to sabotage Congress’s agenda that day.
Read Also:
- Man Arrested For Parachuting His Way Off Of Paris’s Eiffel Tower
- 70 Delhi Govt School’s Students Fall Ill Right After ‘eating mid-day meal
- Carlsen Defeated Praggnanandhaa In Tie-Breaks To Win The Chess World Cup
News Source: https://tinyurl.com/yjnbj9rn
Feature Image Source: https://tinyurl.com/7zapwdt4
About Author
